Fujifilm X-T1 RAF + LR5.4 + vscoFILM

I shoot in raw format because I am not a great photographer. I underexpose. I overexpose. A lot. Having the ability to manipulate shadows, highlights, mid tones, and colour in post production is something that I require in my process. Yes, photography is a process to me. From the concept, to the execution, to the editing to produce the final image – it is a process.


If you’re in the Ultimo, Sydney area, try out a new addition to the community that serves (IMHO) one of the best coffees in town: The Q on Harris (it is at the intersection of the Powerhouse Museum and Hannah’s Pies).


Adobe finally released an update for Lightroom 5 that has support for the Fujifilm X-T1. Not only does it support native raf import, but Adobe has reverse engineered some of the film emulation that us x-series photographers have access to when shooting with our little compact awesome cameras (Provia/STD, Velvia/Vivid, Astia/Soft, and various monochrome). For photos such as these, I experimented with the Velvia setting, just to get a bit more kick into the photos. If I am shooting portraits however, the saturation is a bit too strong for my taste.

All embedded images were shot in raf + jpeg with auto white balance, with the XF35mmF1.4R. I tried to use aperture priority but after a few attempts, I went back to manual because that is what I am used to.


VSCO has been a part of my workflow since its first public release. It has streamlined my editing. At least things are consistent across an entire set of photos. Using the Fuji 400H preset as a base (LR4 Fuji), the settings are applied upon import into Lightroom. From then onwards, it is a matter of adjusting each setting to taste.

Thus far, I have been pleased with the flexibility and malleability of the Fujifilm raf format. I can underexpose each shot and pull the shadows up in LR5.4. Not perfect mind you, nothing like film’s dynamic range, but good enough for a non-bracketed single frame. I suppose this is where my experience differs for the Olympus OMD EM1. The ORF were ok but when ISO is high, the flexibility to play with highlights and shadows were significantly narrower compared to the Fujifilm X-T1.


What are my sharpening settings you may ask?

Radius: 1.5
Detail: 45
Masking 0

I then export, resize, then bring the jpeg files into Alien Skin Exposure 5 for a batch sharpening and compression job. I’m not sure why I’ve stuck with those sharpening settings but they seem to look good. From my experience, mirrorless cameras do not like strong Lightroom sharpening (especially the OMD EM1 ORF files).


Hype Park, Sydney on a rainy overcast day looks supreme with the different shades of green, the blacks, the highlights and the shadows. Add the reflective nature of the wet pavement and it is a beautiful sight. The shadows/blacks are still a bit too strong in this edit but I think you get the gist.


For many Fujifilm photographers, the camera’s jpeg engine will do a good enough job. Whilst I archive and edit raf files, I often wifi the jpeg across to my iPhone to edit and share on social media immediately. I have to admit, the jpegs that come straight out of camera from the X-T1 are damn sexy (add a sprinkle of vscocam and BAM!).

There is one minor issue I have with vscoFILM and the X-T1 at the moment. I cannot find a monochrome preset that looks good to my eye. Ilford HP5 or T-MAX rarely look bad, but on the X-T1’s raf files, they look horrible. And Adobe’s attempt to monochrome is not much better. So I’m not sure what to do …

Back to top|Tweet Post
  • Wonderful shots. I’m going to re-process some recent shots with the VSCO settings you suggested. I love the warm gentle but rich appearance, yet consistent across the set.

    Regarding monochrome, I am also searching for the correct process. I will usually shoot Raw +JPEG using the B-Y setting in environmental portraits with people; B- R for architectural or street shots, and B- G for close-in portraits. Often, the results are good. If having trouble with balance of tones, I will export the RAW to Silver Efex Pro, Fully Dynamic, Fine Art Process, or High Structure. I have not found a film emulation there that I consistently like. I look forward to seeing what you settle on.ReplyCancel

    • Dan

      I think for subjects other than people, the more ‘wild’ film emulation vsco presets of release packs 03-05 will be more fun. But I’m lazy and like to be safe so I stick to my usual preset :P

      I have come to love vsco’s TRI-X and Ilford HP imitations for Canon and Nikon raw files. But for Olympus and Fujifilm, the result I see on the screen is quite repelling. I don’t know what to do. Keeping things within Lightroom is easiest. Whilst I know I can send the file to Silver Efex Pro and bring it back into LR, it is an extra hoop. Perhaps I can see what Alien Skin Exposure 5 throws at me …

      Come to think of it, I haven’t made many monochrome photos for wedding clients ever since my switch from Canon 5DMK3 to mirrorless.ReplyCancel

  • Some wonderful shots of yours. I keep following you on facebook as well.
    Keep these beautiful shots coming to us. Oh and it is not really that difficult to expose the shot correctly with the Fuji cameras.
    I tend to keep an I on the exposure meter in the EVF of my X-T1.


    • Dan

      Wait, there is an exposure meter!!?! Ha!ReplyCancel

  • It really is a lovely coffee.

    Enjoying the edits you are getting from these shots today mate.ReplyCancel

    • Dan

      Damn good brew. Looking forward to tomorrow. Far out, Benji has made me want to live haha. Don’t tell him that though.ReplyCancel

  • […] Fujifilm X-T1 RAF + LR5.4 + vscoFILM […]ReplyCancel

  • Dan, thank you for your blog and for sharing your wonderful imagery. I’m a Nikon shooter on the brink of switching over to FujiX and I’m very happy to have found your blog. I’ve been shooting raw on the XT1 and I’m a bit concerned about how small the raf files become when I export them as jpegs from Lightroom 5. Out of camera on import to LR the raf files are about 35mb but after processing they end up at 6-8 mb jpegs. I’m used to 12-14mb sized jepg files from Nikon full frame raw files. Am I losing that much information from jpeg conversion? Or should I not be concerned about the mb size? thanks and cheers -kathyReplyCancel

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *